Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Aaron Hann's avatar

You got me curious to see if the ark/mother/Mary typology is continued explicitly anywhere else in Scripture. Perhaps you’ve studied this, but Isaiah 54 is very interesting. After the reference to Noah and the flood in v. 9 ( “For this is like the days of Noah to me: when I swore that the water of Noah would never flood the earth again”), the imagery of the flood is applied to Jerusalem (city) in v. 11 “Poor Jerusalem, storm-tossed, and not comforted”. Flood imagery is used in v. 8 (“in a *surge* of anger”) and v. 10 (“though the mountains move and the hills shake”). And at the beginning of ch 54 God promises to the “childless one” that “ the children of the desolate one will be more than the children of the married woman.” So there is the image of the fruitful woman (54:1), the tacit allusion to the ark (54:9), and the image of the fortress city (v. 11) which will be rebuilt from precious stones (vv. 11-12) and fortified against danger (vv. 14-15, 17).

Expand full comment
Ryan Clevenger's avatar

Thanks for writing your continued reflections on this theme. I read Schmitt's article and also found it very interesting. A different angle that I am taking is to compare this with, e.g., Plato's concept of the Soul as a microcosm of the City (which in turn is a microcosm of the cosmos). What stands out immediately is how individualistic that is compared to what Schmitt argues. It's not Individual Soul > City but Man:Woman::Son:City. I honestly don't know what to do with that yet, but I think there might be something interesting there.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts